The Two Popes Ending: What It Really Means

by Admin 43 views
The Two Popes Ending: What It Really Means

Hey guys! Let's dive into the ending of The Two Popes. This movie, released in 2019, explores the relationship between Pope Benedict XVI and Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who would later become Pope Francis. It’s a fascinating look at faith, tradition, and the need for change within the Catholic Church. The film culminates in a powerful and thought-provoking conclusion, so let’s break it down to understand what it really means.

Understanding the Context

Before we jump straight to the ending, it’s crucial to understand the context of the film. The Two Popes isn’t just a historical drama; it’s a character study that delves into the ideologies, beliefs, and personal struggles of two very different men. Pope Benedict XVI, played by Anthony Hopkins, represents the conservative wing of the Church, deeply rooted in tradition and wary of rapid change. On the other hand, Cardinal Bergoglio, portrayed by Jonathan Pryce, embodies a more progressive viewpoint, advocating for greater inclusivity and a closer connection to the people.

The film portrays their initial clashes and eventual bonding as they discuss theological differences, personal doubts, and the future of the Church. Benedict is grappling with his own crisis of faith and the weight of his responsibilities amidst scandals and declining faith. Bergoglio, meanwhile, is contemplating his own potential resignation, feeling a sense of disillusionment with the Church’s bureaucracy and its handling of various crises. These internal struggles set the stage for the pivotal decision that shapes the movie's ending.

Throughout the movie, there are flashbacks to Bergoglio’s past in Argentina, showing his involvement with the Jesuit order and his experiences during the country’s Dirty War. These experiences profoundly shaped his views on social justice and his commitment to serving the poor and marginalized. They also highlight the internal conflict he faced when trying to balance his religious duties with his political convictions. These flashbacks provide a deeper understanding of Bergoglio’s character and his motivations for seeking change within the Church.

The Resignation and the Election

The central event leading up to the ending is Pope Benedict XVI’s unprecedented decision to resign from the papacy. This act, driven by his recognition of his own limitations and a desire to make way for a leader who could better navigate the challenges facing the Church, is a major turning point in the film. Benedict believes that Bergoglio is the right man to lead the Church forward, despite their differing views. He sees in Bergoglio a genuine empathy and a connection to the people that he himself feels he lacks. This realization is a testament to Benedict’s humility and his willingness to put the needs of the Church above his own personal preferences.

The ending depicts the conclave where Cardinal Bergoglio is elected as the new Pope, taking the name Francis. This election is portrayed as a moment of hope and renewal for the Church, signaling a shift towards a more compassionate and inclusive approach. The film highlights the significance of this transition, suggesting that Pope Francis’s leadership would bring about a new era of openness and reform. The choice of the name Francis is also significant, as it evokes the spirit of St. Francis of Assisi, known for his poverty, humility, and love for the poor.

The film doesn’t shy away from showing the complexities and challenges that Pope Francis would face in his new role. It acknowledges the deep divisions within the Church and the resistance to change that he would encounter. However, it also emphasizes the potential for positive transformation and the importance of dialogue and understanding in bridging those divides. The ending leaves the audience with a sense of optimism, suggesting that Pope Francis’s leadership could lead the Church towards a more relevant and meaningful role in the modern world.

The Symbolic Significance of the Ending

The ending of The Two Popes is rich with symbolic meaning. The most obvious is the passing of the torch from the old guard to the new. Benedict’s resignation and Bergoglio’s election represent a generational shift in leadership and a willingness to embrace change. This transition symbolizes the Church’s ability to adapt to the evolving needs of the world while still maintaining its core values.

Another important symbol is the setting of the film, particularly the Vatican and the gardens of Castel Gandolfo. These locations represent the power and tradition of the Church, but also its isolation from the everyday lives of ordinary people. The film juxtaposes these grand settings with scenes of Bergoglio’s humble life in Argentina, emphasizing the contrast between the Church’s opulence and the poverty and suffering that exist in the world. This contrast underscores the need for the Church to be more connected to the people and more responsive to their needs.

The dialogue between Benedict and Bergoglio is also highly symbolic. Their discussions about faith, doubt, and the role of the Church represent the broader debates and tensions within the Catholic Church. Their willingness to listen to each other and find common ground symbolizes the importance of dialogue and understanding in overcoming divisions. The film suggests that even those with deeply different beliefs can find common ground and work together for the greater good.

The Final Scene: A Moment of Unity

The final scene of The Two Popes is particularly poignant. It shows Pope Benedict and Pope Francis watching a football match together, sharing a pizza, and playfully ribbing each other. This scene is a powerful symbol of unity and reconciliation. It suggests that despite their differences in ideology and background, the two men have formed a genuine friendship based on mutual respect and understanding.

This scene also humanizes both men, portraying them as ordinary individuals with their own quirks and passions. It reminds us that even the leaders of the Catholic Church are human beings with their own personal struggles and vulnerabilities. This humanization is an important aspect of the film, as it invites the audience to see the popes not just as symbols of authority, but as relatable individuals with whom they can empathize.

The shared enjoyment of the football match is also significant. Football, as a global sport, represents the universality of human experience and the ability of people from different backgrounds to come together and share a common passion. This scene suggests that the Church, too, should strive to be a universal institution that welcomes people from all walks of life.

What the Ending Really Means

So, what does the ending of The Two Popes really mean? At its core, the film is a call for unity, understanding, and change within the Catholic Church. It suggests that the Church must be willing to adapt to the evolving needs of the world while still maintaining its core values. It emphasizes the importance of dialogue, empathy, and a commitment to social justice.

The film also offers a message of hope. It suggests that even in the face of seemingly insurmountable challenges, positive change is possible. It highlights the power of individual action and the importance of leaders who are willing to listen to the people and put their needs first.

Ultimately, The Two Popes is a film about the human side of faith. It reminds us that the Church is not just a hierarchical institution, but a community of believers who are all striving to live more meaningful and fulfilling lives. It encourages us to see the popes not just as symbols of authority, but as fellow human beings who are grappling with the same questions and challenges that we all face.

In conclusion, the ending of The Two Popes is a powerful and thought-provoking message about the need for change, unity, and understanding within the Catholic Church. It’s a call for leaders to be more empathetic and responsive to the needs of the people, and for individuals to be more open to dialogue and reconciliation. The film leaves us with a sense of hope, suggesting that even in the face of great challenges, positive transformation is possible. What do you guys think? Did the ending resonate with you? Let me know in the comments below!